More or less every thinking man has at one point in his life uttered or at least heard the phrase "X is a-historical" or "Y is not in continuity with history". Admittedly, this doesn't apply to thinking middle aged children one must often deal with in the public sphere of our day, but the question still stands: what exactly do we mean when we claim that something is historically shallow?
KT on Youtube
Get more stuff like this
in your inbox
Subscribe to our mailing list and get interesting stuff and updates to your email inbox.
Thank you for subscribing.
Something went wrong.
we respect your privacy and take protecting it seriously
- Agenda 21 Alexander Dugin alt media alt right Ananda Deirdre Aristotle boiler room Branko Malić Catholic Church Christianity Club of Rome communism Conspiracy theory Croatia EU geopolitics Hegel Immanuel Kant Luminar Podcast Martin Heidegger metaphysics Mihai Marinescu Modernity nihilism Philosophy Plato Plotinus political correctness politics of dissolution post-Nazism Posthumanism postmodern postmodernity Rene Guenon sustainable development synchronicity technocracy terrorism Theology Thomas Aquinas totalitarianism Tradition Traditionalism War in Yugoslavia Yugoslavia