When someone says that being and one are convertible, what does this mean? In this podcast we'll explicate some of the distinctive qualities of this distinct indivisibility and undivided distinction. Also, we address the error of understanding explication of oneness as reduction to mathematical or physical unit, quite alien to traditional thought, and proneness of contemporary "back to origins" thinkers to perpetuating it especially when they're explicitly trying to refute it. We demonstrate how somewhat natural temptation to find one, indivisible and comprehensive historical point from which all the ills of our times can be explained is utterly in opposition to the One that transcends determinations and is the proper origin of time and what it brings forth.
- Agenda 21 Alexander Dugin alt media alt right Ananda Deirdre Aristotle Branko Malić Catholic Church Christianity classical german idealism Club of Rome communism Conspiracy theory geopolitics Hegel Immanuel Kant individuum Luminar Podcast Martin Heidegger metaphysics Mihai Marinescu Modernity nihilism Ontology Philosophy Plato Plotinus political correctness politics of dissolution post-Nazism Posthumanism postmodernity Rene Guenon Scholastics sustainable development synchronicity technocracy Theology Thomas Aquinas totalitarianism Tradition Traditionalism transcendentals War in Yugoslavia Yugoslavia